Electoral Reform in BC

A Policy Note series on proportional representation

About the series

From October 22 to November 30, 2018, British Columbians will be voting on a new electoral system for our province. The ballot will ask two questions: Do voters want to change from our current first-past-the-post (FPTP) system to a form of proportional representation (“pro rep”)? The second question will ask, if British Columbia adopts a proportional representation voting system, which of the following voting systems do you prefer? And people will get to rank their preferences between Mixed Member, Dual Member or Rural-Urban.

  • Mixed Member has voters elect 60% of MLAs from their ridings, and the other 40% from regional party lists, such that each party gets a number of seats that corresponds to their share of the popular vote.
  • Dual Member would see parties nominate two candidates for each riding. The first seat will go to the first candidate of the party with the most votes; the second seat would be allocated based on the provincial and local popular vote.
  • Rural-Urban is a mixed system in which rural MLAs would be elected using the Mixed Member model above, and urban ridings would be combined and elect five to seven MLAs by ranking candidates in order of preference.

The CCPA-BC has determined that pro rep would much better reflect the real preferences and backgrounds of BC voters. This series of posts explains why and debunks myths from the ‘No’ side.
 


Recommended resources from others

July 2018 | CBC News
What’s the difference between all these voting systems?
 

July 2018 | The Tyee
BC’s options for electoral reform explained

 


In the news

July 2018 | Redeye (Vancouver Co-Op Radio)
Seth Klein explains the principle of pro rep and the proposed models for BC

 

 

The latest

July 2018 | Seth Klein
How electoral reform enhances local representation
An all-too-common argument used to oppose changing our electoral system this fall is that a new system will diminish or end local representation. But in fact, the opposite is true. Each pro rep option on offer ensures you will have both a nearby MLA, as well as an MLA in relatively close proximity who shares your political values. Read article »
 


 

July 2018 | Seth Klein and Vyas Saran
Electoral reform will not enable the far right: Debunking a red herring

Does pro rep enable far right or “extremist” political parties? Short answer: No. As Seth Klein and Vyas Saran explain, no electoral system has a monopoly on either preventing or fostering far right parties. The contention that first-past-the-post saves us from extremist political elements is, they write, “rubbish.” Read article »
 


 

June 2018 | Seth Klein and Vyas Saran
Electoral reform is simple, actually

In the first post of the series, Seth Klein and Vyas Saran debunk claims that the options for electoral reform in BC are just too complicated for citizens to navigate. This post explains the options before us, and shows that British Columbians can (and should) choose a new system that captures how we want to balance local representation with proportional outcomes. Read article »
 


 

October 2016 | Alex Himelfarb
Why proportional representation is likely to produce better public policy

Two years before the start of this series, Alex Himelfarb explained why a more proportional electoral system—in which the results of our elections more accurately reflect how we actually voted— would indeed matter for the strength of our democracy and for the quality of our governance and public policy. Read article »
 


 

September 2016 | Maxwell Cameron
How proportional representation could help to decentralize power and strengthen Parliament

Back in 2016, Maxwell Cameron shared his submission to the House of Commons Special Committee on Electoral Reform, which explains how the adoption of a more proportional electoral system could bring more voices into government, restore balance, and prevent the abuses of power. Read article »